The Time Machine is impossible!
Because of this!
Because of this “Time-Bomb”!
The additions and subtractions of the time will explode everything.
“If any man shall add unto these things…”
“…if any man shall take away from the …” unverse…
“…in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.”
Do you have the courage to preach it?
Nowadays the problem is not the truth.
But the market: How many accepts or not.
Just because of the relativity of things.
Everything is fun and imagination.
The only battlefield that was left was the technology: it works or not?
Will this algorithm works?
But when speaking of the algorithm of the universe still prevails up care.
“Atomic Bomb”, or “M Bomb” or “Time Bomb”?
“The Algorithm of the Universe”, or “The Algorithm of the Life”?
Evolution or Creation?
Where is the real Time Machine to tell us about it?
It’s not Cosmovision.
Because Cosmovisions are human construction while the Planck’s Natural Units are “… necessarily retain their meaning for all times and for all civilizations, even extraterrestrial and non-human ones …” (1899, wikipedia)
They are not human construct or conventional.
Physicists don’t interpret them correctly. The reason is they define units to usual construct only, as social constructs. “In physical sciences, numerical values (such as constants, quantities, or scales of measurement) are called conventional if they do not represent a measured property of nature, but originate in a convention, for example an average of many measurements, agreed between the scientists working with these values.” (wikipedia) And “Social constructs are generally understood to be the by-products of countless human choices rather than laws resulting from divine will or nature.” (wikipedia)
Planck’s Natural Units are used as “Dimensional Analysis” and “to simplifying equations” at the same time, but are fundamentally “Laws of Universe”, namely, “The Algorithm of the Universe”, meaning that the law itself already contains algorithms to create the Universe: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist.” (Hawking, 2010)
It is the “M-Theory”, what claim “…without a single equation”.
The question, with this point, becomes the diversity of the Cosmovisions to the number of equations.
But Hawking is wrong.
Maybe he is hiding again or diverting attention again back to the other direction: “One can’t prove that God doesn’t exist, but science makes God unnecessary.”
The interest is God or not-God.
If the laws of nature are independents of human construction, so it’s understandable that he finds different ways of creating the universe without God.
To do this uses the name of science.
“In the name of Science, I command you: Come out, ignorance!”
“In the name of Science, I command you: Come out, God!”
Where will God go?
To out of the universe!
To out of the Planck’s universe!
It visualizes the universe of Planck’s Cosmology!
“Proclaiming the Algorithm of the Universe”
Max Planck never knew that his Universe made with his Natural Units is unique World.
No one knew.
Maybe some physicists and some politicians knew that.
Or maybe not.
But now we proclaiming the Algorithm of the Universe.
With Planck’s Natural Units.
This is the Cosmology of Planck.